Author Topic: members (Read 12350 times)

loulou · « **on:** November 28, 2004, 10:32:26 pm »

I think it very odd that there are 110 forum members and about 100 of them only come on here once or twice and disappear. I'm thinking its the multiple name thing going on again.Own up bounty..just how many names have you got?

« **Reply #1 on:** November 29, 2004, 08:25:31 am »

Three. Bounty Hunter, DrWho and Easter Bunny. All the others (Half man half KitKat, Looby Loo, Chocolate Police and Crunchie Man) have been consigned to the cupboard.

loulou · « **Reply #2 on:** November 29, 2004, 09:30:58 am »

No more you want to confess to?

chocolate chick · « **Reply #3 on:** November 29, 2004, 10:14:57 am »

Perhaps log in's should have an expiry date. e.g if a member doesn't log in for say..60 days. There 'account' is deleted. Chocadmin?

loulou · « **Reply #4 on:** November 29, 2004, 10:40:25 am »

Good thinking choc chick. Gold star for you on this bright monday morning.

chocolate chick · « **Reply #5 on:** November 29, 2004, 11:46:41 am »

« **Reply #6 on:** November 29, 2004, 12:28:36 pm »

Even better, here's a gold Chocolate Chick!

chocolate chick · « **Reply #7 on:** November 29, 2004, 01:12:19 pm »

oooo even better

smurfboy · « **Reply #8 on:** November 29, 2004, 01:32:54 pm »

I don't see the point of automatically cancelling someone's registration just because they're not regular users. It's not as if there's a limit to the number of members and these people are stopping newcomers from joining.

« **Reply #9 on:** November 29, 2004, 09:52:01 pm »

I think Chocolate Chick was looking for an incentive to remain active on the forum, rather than introducing a prescriptive way of excluding members. Right Chicky?

loulou · « **Reply #10 on:** November 29, 2004, 10:50:41 pm »

That's how I understood it too. You can have a gold star too bounty but only a little one.

« **Reply #11 on:** November 30, 2004, 08:31:31 am »

loulou · « **Reply #12 on:** November 30, 2004, 08:42:33 am »

Well it can't be as big as choc chicks star.

chocolate chick · « **Reply #13 on:** November 30, 2004, 11:17:17 am »

Quote from: bounty hunter

I think Chocolate Chick was looking for an incentive to remain active on the forum, rather than introducing a prescriptive way of excluding members. Right Chicky?

Thats the way I meant it.

chocolate chick · « **Reply #14 on:** November 30, 2004, 11:18:17 am »

Quote from: loulou

Well it can't be as big as choc chicks star.

Aww thanks Lou Lou Fancy sharing a bag of Maltesers with me?

News:

Author Topic: members (Read 12350 times)