Chocolate Forum

Chat => General => Topic started by: on May 01, 2005, 10:04:24 pm

Title: Hitch Hikers’ disappointment
Post by: on May 01, 2005, 10:04:24 pm

I went to the cinema last night with my girlfriend in anticipation of reacquainting myself with one of my all time favourite stories, 'The Hitch Hikers Guide to the Galaxy'.  It started reasonably enough, appearing to follow the original story.  However it quickly became evident that this polished sci-fi reproduction, while having all good intentions in following Adam's plotline simply failed to capture the whackiness and finesse of the original.  Martin Freeman (Tim from 'The Office') as Arthur Dent and Mos Def as Ford Prefect do their best to recapture the atmosphere of the book and the TV series, but it fails to hang together. 


Part of the problem was that I knew what was coming, and while the humour should have been fresh, it fell flat and we ended up with a mildly amusing film at best.  Freeman would have done well to have studied the performances of Simon Jones from the TV series, rather than attempting to put his own stamp on a part which Jones made immortal. 


The film is saved from complete mediocrity by the superb Sam Rockwell as Zaphod Beeblebrox and the attractive and suitably oddly named Zooey Deschanel as Trillian.


I was so disappointed and my girlfriend so bored (A non Adams fan) that we left early and drowned our sorrows in a nearby winebar.


4/10


 

Title: Hitch Hikers’ disappointment
Post by: loulou on May 01, 2005, 10:26:10 pm
wouldn't you have been better off to go see a comedy and stuff yourself with popcorn and minstrels 10/10
Title: Hitch Hikers’ disappointment
Post by: on May 02, 2005, 09:45:24 am
Loulou why do you have to trivialise everything?
Title: Hitch Hikers’ disappointment
Post by: robbie on May 02, 2005, 12:07:59 pm
Bounty, you are a half-wit.
Title: Hitch Hikers’ disappointment
Post by: loulou on May 02, 2005, 03:05:10 pm

Quote from: bounty hunter
Loulou why do you have to trivialise everything?


What's that mean?

Title: Hitch Hikers’ disappointment
Post by: on May 02, 2005, 03:54:46 pm
Title: Hitch Hikers’ disappointment
Post by: goldencup on May 02, 2005, 06:26:40 pm
I'm very disappointed now  as I was looking forward to seeing the film, also being a great fan of the books and especially the TV series. I even partly bought my last house because it was No. 42!  I shall see it anyway though.  Bounty, is it right that there's a new character invented for it too?  I would have thought that unnecessary.
Title: Hitch Hikers’ disappointment
Post by: on May 02, 2005, 06:48:59 pm

I saw it last night too.


Whilst I can see where you are coming from Bounty, I read an article that warned that HHs would not like it.


I went therefore with an open mind and watched it for what it was.


Yes, I cried out when I saw the original Marvin and Arthur, but the hangar where the 2nd Earth was created was worth the admission alone.


Incidentally the new Zaphod grated on me.


I STAYED right to the end and would give it 7.5/10.

Title: Hitch Hikers’ disappointment
Post by: loulou on May 02, 2005, 07:05:30 pm
pham did you have popcorn and sweets?
Title: Hitch Hikers’ disappointment
Post by: on May 02, 2005, 09:59:25 pm
SHARED a popcorn and coke.
Title: Hitch Hikers’ disappointment
Post by: oldspice on May 02, 2005, 10:55:29 pm
I am not a Hitch Hikers fan. I should be because I like wacky humour - but I don't like Sci Fi or fantasy fiction.
Title: Hitch Hikers’ disappointment
Post by: loulou on May 03, 2005, 09:33:13 am
Me neither.