Post by: oldspice on February 19, 2008, 07:12:36 pm
Poor deranged Al Fyed claims that the death of Diana and his son Dodi is the work of a massive conspiracy involving not only Prince Phillip and MI6 but Diana's own sister and close friends, Tony Blair and the French and British Governments. She had to die, he claims, so that Charles could marry his 'crocodile' lover, Camilla and because Diana and Dodi were expecting a Muslim baby which was torn from her womb by conspiritors in an effort to cover up the pregnancy.
The Royals are a 'Dracula' family he claims and Prince Phillip is a 'Nazi'. Additionally, Phillip is really 'German' (his parents were actually Greek and Danish but he did have German ancestors) so he should therefore 'go back to where he came from'.
Hm. Not doing himself any favours is he? Can you imagine the uproar if a member of the Royal Family publically said such things about a high ranking Muslim?
Post by: Forth Bridges on February 19, 2008, 09:54:07 pm
and many people actually believe she was pregent:
why was she enbanded???
Post by: oldspice on February 20, 2008, 06:46:11 am
She was not 'embalmed' at all. Remember, Muslims bury their dead within 24 hours whenever possible so Al Fyed may be unfamiliar with the processes carried out on people whose burial is delayed. More than a week passed before Diana was buried. It is commom practice to 'pack' the body spaces (I won't go into detail) with gauze soaked in something that helps to preserve the bits that are most likely to rot first. The body is then kept refridgerated until just before the funeral ceremony. This happens to almost all bodies where burial or cremation does not take place within 24 hours.
Post by: on February 20, 2008, 07:30:21 am
Post by: on February 20, 2008, 07:59:40 am
Bah! That wascwally conspiwacy!
Post by: loulou on February 20, 2008, 09:22:34 am
Post by: smurfboy on February 20, 2008, 01:37:27 pm
Quote from: 623058
it would be outrage, but people like al fyed!
and many people actually believe she was pregent:
why was she enbanded???
I keep hearing about these 'many people'. Are they the same 'many people' you mentioned a few weeks ago who believed Henri Paul wasn't drunk? People believe all kinds of things; that doesn't make them true.
Neither I or you know whether Diana was embalmed, unless there is something you haven't been telling us and you actually worked for a funeral director in Paris in 1997. And even if she was, millions of dead bodies have been embalmed over the years - were they all pregnant at the time of death too, with a conspiracy to cover it up?
I feel sorry for Mohammed Fayed as I would for any parent who lost a child, but he's making himself look like a lunatic. And if he's so keen on sending people back to where they came from, why has he spent years pushing for British citizenship?
Post by: on February 20, 2008, 08:30:10 pm
Quote from: smurfboy
Neither I or you know whether Diana was embalmed, unless there is something you haven't been telling us and you actually worked for a funeral director in Paris in 1997.
Nope. There was a French bus strike that month. So no chance for 623.
Post by: oldspice on February 21, 2008, 06:42:27 am
What amazes me is that Al Fyed makes all these claims about Prince Phillip/M16/French & British Governments/ French and British medical organisations/Diana's sister and friends being involved in the 'murder' of Diana
AND YET:
Who owned the hotel they were seen leaving before the crash? Mr Al Fyed.
Who owned the car that was driving them? Mr Al Fyed.
Who employed the driver, who was drunk, who was clearly seen (and filmed) drinking to excess in the hotel bar? Mr Al Fyed.
Who employed the body guards that were 'looking after' Dodi and Diana?
Mr Al Fyed.
Now, I am not saying that he consipred to kill them, no, not at all, what I am saying is - his employees were not exactly the most reliable and responsible of people to be carrying such a 'precious' cargo.
Post by: loulou on February 22, 2008, 07:03:22 pm
Post by: oldspice on February 23, 2008, 08:06:56 am
Post by: smurfboy on February 24, 2008, 10:51:51 pm
Post by: loulou on February 24, 2008, 10:54:32 pm
Post by: smurfboy on February 24, 2008, 10:55:37 pm
Post by: oldspice on February 25, 2008, 06:45:53 am
Quote from: loulou
Yes but Harrods is a nice shop.
It USED to be a nice shop. Have you been in there lately Lou? It's the height of bad taste. It's Chavucci paradise.
Post by: loulou on February 26, 2008, 12:07:44 am
Post by: oldspice on February 26, 2008, 07:13:23 am
Thanks!
Post by: on March 08, 2008, 07:13:15 pm
Post by: smurfboy on March 08, 2008, 07:15:19 pm
Post by: on March 08, 2008, 07:24:26 pm