Chocolate Forum

Chat => General => Topic started by: loulou on February 09, 2007, 09:09:23 pm

Title: TV licence
Post by: loulou on February 09, 2007, 09:09:23 pm
Did you know that when you reach 74 you get your licence for half price and when you are 75 it is free.
Title: TV licence
Post by: Forth Bridges on February 09, 2007, 09:11:24 pm
Yes 
Title: TV licence
Post by: smurfboy on February 09, 2007, 09:11:35 pm
What's the point of the half price year?
Title: TV licence
Post by: loulou on February 09, 2007, 09:12:26 pm
i dunno.
Title: TV licence
Post by: goldencup on February 09, 2007, 10:53:41 pm

In some circumstances, you may qualify for a concessionary licence. For example, if you are over 74, you can apply for a Short Term Licence, which will cover you until the month you turn 75, at this point you become entitled to a free Over 75 Licence. If you are blind, you can apply for a Blind Concessionary Licence at 50% of the full licence fee. And if you live in residential care, you may qualify for a licence at £5 per year.


All becomes clear!  

Title: TV licence
Post by: loulou on February 09, 2007, 11:25:36 pm
Blind people shouldn't pay anything.
Title: TV licence
Post by: smurfboy on February 10, 2007, 01:01:53 pm
I think it should be scrapped.
Title: TV licence
Post by: goldencup on February 10, 2007, 01:03:04 pm

Quote from: smurfboy
I think it should be scrapped.


Not that one again.

Title: TV licence
Post by: loulou on February 10, 2007, 01:05:05 pm
Title: TV licence
Post by: smurfboy on February 10, 2007, 01:09:24 pm
Quote from: goldencup

Quote from: smurfboy
I think it should be scrapped.


Not that one again.



Yes that one again. Someone starts a thread about the TV licence so I say what I think of it. It's how a conversation works.

Title: TV licence
Post by: loulou on February 10, 2007, 01:10:57 pm
How about we have a meter on our tv's and only pay for what we watch?
Title: TV licence
Post by: goldencup on February 10, 2007, 01:13:03 pm
How about we all say we never watch BBC anyway?
Title: TV licence
Post by: smurfboy on February 10, 2007, 01:13:14 pm
You just know you'd run out of coins as soon as something good came on.
Title: TV licence
Post by: Forth Bridges on February 10, 2007, 01:16:36 pm
Its not going away any time  soon Just like the DAM tax sorry bridge toll you have to pay to get in to north and south its a fifer tax we don;t like we hate but it an;t going away



Title: TV licence
Post by: loulou on February 10, 2007, 01:16:49 pm
How about they put adverts on BBC?
Title: TV licence
Post by: goldencup on February 10, 2007, 01:17:49 pm
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Title: TV licence
Post by: loulou on February 10, 2007, 01:18:44 pm
How about you throw your tv away?
Title: TV licence
Post by: goldencup on February 10, 2007, 01:20:18 pm
Who dear?  Me dear?  No dear!  I'm not complaining about the TV licence.
Title: TV licence
Post by: loulou on February 10, 2007, 01:21:40 pm
smurfy could throw his tv out with the old bananas.
Title: TV licence
Post by: smurfboy on February 10, 2007, 01:26:02 pm

Quote from: loulou
How about they put adverts on BBC?


Agreed.

Title: TV licence
Post by: Velvet Darkness on February 10, 2007, 01:33:30 pm

Quote from: goldencup
How about we all say we never watch BBC anyway?


That would be a great idea, if only there was a chance of it working, there's never anything on BBC TV anyway.


Truthfully there is nothing on my television at all unless I have a Sky box. We live on the side of a mountain and it blocks all the signals from the terrestrial TV, so all we get is snow on every channel. So I pay the BBC for a TV licence just to have a TV sitting in my house, then I have to pay Sky in order to have anything to actually watch on it!


It's a lot to have to go through just for Dancing On Ice on a Saturday night!

Title: TV licence
Post by: loulou on February 10, 2007, 01:35:42 pm
Who do you think will win Dancing on Ice velvet?
Title: TV licence
Post by: Velvet Darkness on February 10, 2007, 01:38:50 pm

Just one more question.


Slightly tongue in cheek but also out of sheer curiosity.


If you are blind in just the one eye do you get a 25% reduction in your licence fee?


Just seems like the kind of silly thing the BBC WOULD do.

Title: TV licence
Post by: loulou on February 10, 2007, 01:40:03 pm
I think you have to be fully blind. I wonder if the deaf get a reduction.
Title: TV licence
Post by: Velvet Darkness on February 10, 2007, 01:41:49 pm
Quote from: goldencup

In some circumstances, you may qualify for a concessionary licence. For example, if you are over 74, you can apply for a Short Term Licence,


Is that where they let you pay it month by month in case you snuff it before you reach 75?

Title: TV licence
Post by: loulou on February 10, 2007, 01:45:09 pm
Under the Communications Act 2003, you need a television licence to receive or record television programmes. This applies if they are received by a satellite, cable or land based transmitter. If you are watching any satellite service, controlled from within or outside the UK, you must have a television licence.

You may have been informed, in the past, that a television licence was not required if you received television program services from outside the United Kingdom. This was changed in the Communications Act 2003, and if you are using your TV to receive or record television programmes broadcast by satellite from outside the UK, you are now legally required to have a TV licence.
Title: TV licence
Post by: Velvet Darkness on February 10, 2007, 02:10:54 pm
Title: TV licence
Post by: Velvet Darkness on February 10, 2007, 02:17:43 pm

Clair Buckfield is very good but I think the fact that she is naturally good and doesn't seem to be having it as tough as some of the others will count against her.


I like Lee Sharp, but then any hunky footballer brave enough to wear spandex, lycra and sequins has to be worth a mention don't you think?


I think Duncan James might win though.


Do you watch too Loulou or are you just humouring me?

Title: TV licence
Post by: loulou on February 10, 2007, 02:35:04 pm
No I have been watching too and I think Claire is a natural and I think she may win. I think Lee's height is a problem for him and i do think it's a lot harder for the men than the women when it comes to lifts so I would have liked to see the comp split and have a male and a female winner.
Title: TV licence
Post by: Velvet Darkness on February 10, 2007, 04:25:33 pm

Quote from: loulou
i do think it's a lot harder for the men than the women when it comes to lifts so I would have liked to see the comp split and have a male and a female winner.


That's a good idea. I was going to say that I'm surprised they didn't think of that, but when I think about it properly, I'm not really that surprised.  


A seperate winner for each sex would make far too much sense wouldn't it?


I am impressed by the bravery of the women involved. The celebrities have to trust their professional partners enough to let them throw them and swing them around all over the place, and the professional women have to trust their celebrity partners even more. Some of the lifts they do could quite easily end badly when the person lifting them is not only nervous about the lifting itself, but also a serious beginner to the whole thing and still quite wobbly on his skates! I cringe watching them collect bruises like I used to collect stamps, and come off the ice limping and hobbling holding their hips/bums/heads/elbows.


Call me over cautious or even a chicken if you like, but I don't think I'd fancy that.

Title: TV licence
Post by: wjp666 on February 10, 2007, 04:31:46 pm
get rid of the TV license and make tv 100% commercial, that's what i say...
Title: TV licence
Post by: smurfboy on February 10, 2007, 06:17:17 pm
Me too
Title: TV licence
Post by: Velvet Darkness on February 10, 2007, 06:20:27 pm
Yup I would agree with that.
Title: TV licence
Post by: kevvosa on February 10, 2007, 06:55:20 pm
Me too. 
Title: TV licence
Post by: goldencup on February 10, 2007, 11:35:50 pm
Not me.
Title: TV licence
Post by: loulou on February 10, 2007, 11:37:08 pm
Nor me. I don't want to watch loads of ads.
Title: TV licence
Post by: kevvosa on February 10, 2007, 11:47:12 pm
I'd rather watch ads and use the TV license money for other things.

Title: TV licence
Post by: smurfboy on February 11, 2007, 01:45:13 pm
Exactly. It gives you a break to go to the loo or make a cuppa.
Title: TV licence
Post by: oldspice on February 11, 2007, 02:27:31 pm
Generally, I hate Tv commercials but I agree it's handy to be able to have a pee or make a cuppa between or during programmes.
Title: TV licence
Post by: wjp666 on February 11, 2007, 02:52:23 pm

Quote from: loulou
Nor me. I don't want to watch loads of ads.


out of the hundreds of channels we now have, there's only 4 channels on tv that DON'T show ads (and two of them are only part-time)... are you really saying that you want to pay £150 for these 4 measly channels?

Title: TV licence
Post by: smurfboy on February 11, 2007, 03:19:28 pm

Exactly. It hits low income families very hard. And what about people who are struggling to pay their kids' university tuition fees, plus rent, and then have to fork out for a second TV licence for them?  The fee is a complete con too - the huge, above inflation increases in recent years have been used to pay for digital channels the majority of people don't have access to!!!


I can't believe that the Tory government believed it was sensible to sell off the country's railway network, which is now in chaos, but to keep a TV station in public ownership.

Title: TV licence
Post by: Forth Bridges on February 11, 2007, 03:20:15 pm
cought 6 channels

BBC1
BBC2
BBC3 / CBBC
BBC4 / Cbeebis
BBC N24
BBC Partlement

ADN ALL OF BBC radio station!



Title: TV licence
Post by: smurfboy on February 11, 2007, 03:21:19 pm
Was that meant to be cough or count? And my point is that most people don't have access to the channels other than BBC1 and 2!
Title: TV licence
Post by: Forth Bridges on February 11, 2007, 03:24:33 pm
Form Next year the swithing off the ANaulgoe transmitter




Title: TV licence
Post by: smurfboy on February 11, 2007, 03:26:59 pm
Yet another thing being forced on us to make us spend more money.
Title: TV licence
Post by: wjp666 on February 11, 2007, 03:29:46 pm
indeed!
Title: TV licence
Post by: Forth Bridges on February 11, 2007, 03:30:41 pm
What £20 for a Digi box

that only £20 divied by 75 years = divd by 4 again =

Title: TV licence
Post by: Forth Bridges on February 11, 2007, 03:33:16 pm

sorry another mistake



62305839124.6496759259
Title: TV licence
Post by: wjp666 on February 11, 2007, 03:37:04 pm
if BBC want public funding so much, they should go subscription like all the other channels. with ther introduction of digital-ONLY tv in the next few yeafrs, it can easily be done. i can't beliebve it's mandatory to pay for BBC in the year 2007.
Title: TV licence
Post by: Forth Bridges on February 11, 2007, 03:43:05 pm
Only if you own a TV set
Title: TV licence
Post by: kevvosa on February 11, 2007, 06:24:55 pm
I don't watch that much TV and yet still have to pay my license for the times I do. I think this is unfair. I don't need to pay for a radio license or a computer license, so why should I have to pay for TV? 
Title: TV licence
Post by: smurfboy on February 11, 2007, 06:38:22 pm
The licence fee also covers BBC radio, but I hardly listen to that either. We used to listen to Radio 1 in my old office and they played about ten different tracks repeated five or six times a day!
Title: TV licence
Post by: kevvosa on February 11, 2007, 06:58:08 pm
Radio 1 is absolute rubbish and the presenters are annoying. 
Title: TV licence
Post by: oldspice on February 11, 2007, 08:26:14 pm
I could not live without Radio 4
Title: TV licence
Post by: Velvet Darkness on February 11, 2007, 10:24:53 pm

Quote from: kevvosa
Radio 1 is absolute rubbish and the presenters are annoying. 


I agree with that but my kids say that's just because I'm so old!!

Title: TV licence
Post by: smurfboy on February 11, 2007, 11:47:03 pm
Well Kev and I are young (well, youngish in my case!) and we're on your side Velvet!
Title: TV licence
Post by: goldencup on February 12, 2007, 12:43:08 am
My teenagers wouldn't be seen dead listening to Radio 1.
Title: TV licence
Post by: Forth Bridges on February 12, 2007, 08:35:30 am
I don;t either! nor did half the high school! 
Title: TV licence
Post by: Cherry_Ripe on February 12, 2007, 10:31:48 am

I listen to Radio 1 at work; I used to love Jo Whiley's show but lately it's not so good. I don't like Chris Moyles' show at all. I used to love Spoony at weekends but he has now moved on. The show which replaced him (Reggie Yates and Fern Cotton) is terrible, like CBeebies on the radio!


I agree with Smurfy, that the same few tracks are played over and over again. That song about "I've had the same jeans on for 4 days now" is just soooooooo irritating! I think I will switch to Radio 2 and see what that is like.

Title: TV licence
Post by: kevvosa on February 12, 2007, 11:53:20 am

Quote from: Cherry_Ripe

I don't like Chris Moyles' show at all. 



Chris Moyles is one of the most annoying radio presenters I've ever heard. He thinks he's funny but just isn't.