Chocolate Forum

Chat => General => Topic started by: oldspice on May 06, 2006, 09:08:20 am

Title: Should John Prescott resign???
Post by: oldspice on May 06, 2006, 09:08:20 am

He keeps his title, keeps his grace-and-favour properties, keeps his salary but........ he doesn't have to do any work!


If I thought I was going to land all that for shagging on the side I might me tempted........

Title: Should John Prescott resign???
Post by: smurfboy on May 06, 2006, 12:17:38 pm

If he had any pride he'd resign. As it is he'll probably stay on until Brown gets in and then 'retire' - collecting a big fat pension in the process.


The office of 'Deputy Prime Minister' is completely pointless anyway when we all know the Chancellor is due to take over in the top job any time now. They've let Prescott coast for years because he's the only relic of Old Labour left; a bit like that period in the early nineties when they couldn't think of anything for Ken to do in Corrie but didn't dare sack their only original cast member.

Title: Should John Prescott resign???
Post by: oldspice on May 06, 2006, 08:18:47 pm
 A relic of 'old labour'. He didn't have any problems about throwing off the old Labour mantle and getting his nose in the New Labour trough though did he? 
Title: Should John Prescott resign???
Post by: oldspice on May 07, 2006, 04:39:15 pm

Question:


Why is John Prescott like an MFI product?


Answer:


Two screws and the cabinet collapses

Title: Should John Prescott resign???
Post by: loulou on May 07, 2006, 04:56:36 pm
 ROTFL 





Title: Should John Prescott resign???
Post by: on May 07, 2006, 05:53:23 pm


I wonder if mhe used Tony-speak?


"Let's be clear about this love, I want you to look at my MAN-i-fester and see if there is anything you find hard to swallow."

Title: Should John Prescott resign???
Post by: oldspice on May 07, 2006, 05:55:13 pm
Title: Should John Prescott resign???
Post by: Forth Bridges on May 07, 2006, 06:01:30 pm
if he was sack he coudl beening down tony blair so blair had to keep him!
Title: Should John Prescott resign???
Post by: loulou on May 07, 2006, 06:16:12 pm
what?
Title: Should John Prescott resign???
Post by: oldspice on May 07, 2006, 06:20:21 pm
Title: Should John Prescott resign???
Post by: smurfboy on May 07, 2006, 06:50:08 pm
I think it's meant to say if he was sacked he could bring Tony Blair down. He couldn't.
Title: Should John Prescott resign???
Post by: Forth Bridges on May 07, 2006, 07:35:31 pm

he old labour he has friend in low places that could help him


your problay right he still be deputy prime mister when Gordern brown or someone eles is incontrol

Title: Should John Prescott resign???
Post by: on May 07, 2006, 08:16:28 pm

John Prescott is a miserable old tw*t.


 


 


 


 

bounty hunter38844.8043171296
Title: Should John Prescott resign???
Post by: loulou on May 07, 2006, 08:20:45 pm
 I Agree 





Title: Should John Prescott resign???
Post by: oldspice on May 08, 2006, 08:11:07 am

How could John Precott bring Tony down using friends from his old labour days. Who listens to them anymore? Anyway, all of John Precott's friends from old labour don't want to know him because he lined up behind Tony.